The ICE List Wiki is independently maintained. Support helps cover infrastructure, archiving, and verification. Donate ×

Giant Oak

From ICE List Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Giant Oak

Giant Oak

Industry Data analytics; AI/ML software; open-source intelligence (OSINT); social media monitoring
Country United States
Founded 2013
Headquarters Arlington, Virginia, United States
Parent company
Status Active
Verification

Verified

Verification status: Verified

Overview

Giant Oak is a United States–based data analytics and software company that markets AI/ML-driven screening and monitoring tools, including open-source and social media analytics products. Public reporting, FOIA-released DHS documentation, and federal procurement records describe Giant Oak as a contractor whose products and services have been used by DHS components involved in immigration enforcement, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and ICE Homeland Security Investigations (HSI).[1][2]

Boycott

Giant Oak is listed for boycott due to documented work supporting ICE/DHS immigration enforcement capacity through open-source and social media monitoring, aggregation, and analytics.

Public research and reporting describe ICE/HSI use of “Giant Oak Search Technology” (GOST) to monitor and analyze online and social media content, including for immigration-related targeting and investigative prioritization.[1][3][4]

Federal procurement records also show DHS contract awards to GIANT OAK, INC., consistent with provision of data analytics capabilities used within DHS immigration enforcement and related operational contexts.[5][6][7]

Because open-source and social media analytics contracts can materially expand surveillance, lead-generation, and targeting capacity, ICE List documents and, where applicable, boycotts companies whose work supports immigration enforcement operations and related investigative functions.[1][2]

Background

ICE and other DHS components rely on contractors for technology and analytics across enforcement and investigative functions. Social media monitoring and automated/algorithmic lead-ranking tools are routinely criticized for privacy risks, bias, and error—especially when used for immigration enforcement decisions with high stakes for affected individuals and communities.[1][8]

Sources